Navigation: Main Page » Computer / Recreational / Science / Society / Television
 
Web N-N-A.com
         
Science Groups Forum Index  »  Anthropology - Paleo (Archive)  »  Running Woman
Page 1 of 2    Goto page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
Marc Verhaegen
Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:48 am
Guest
Somebody sent this to AAT http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT but I think this
sort of "discussions" are more suited for s.a.p [some comments between
brackets --MV]

Quote:
Quoted in Natural History Magazine, Decmber 2006-January 2007
(http://www.naturalhistorymag.com/). Click on Online Extras -
Samplings to view:
Running Man
Couch potatoes may disagree, but people are fairly well built to run
in the heat.["people"?? A adult young men of a few remote populations,
they mean?]
We sweat more per unit of body surface area than any
other animal, [Yes, never seen in cursorial mammals: it's a waste of
water+sodium: as Montagna said, "a real physiological blunder"]
and our upright posture exposes less body surface to
the sun than would walking on all fours, [yes, that's why all cursorial
animals walk on all twos... Very Happy The upright/shadow "argument" goes back
to Lee 1950 (Schmidt-Nielsen "Desert animals"), but it holds only if you
stand still & completely vertical at 12 o'clock... Nobody hunts "upright",
of course: it's the best way to alarm your prey...)
and more surface to the
cooling wind. ["cooling" wind in "heat" where air temperatures at midday
far exceed 37°C??]
On the hunt, those traits give people a distinct
advantage over most quarry. [yes, of course, that's the reason why human
populations densities are highest in the savannas...]
In fact, Australian Aborigines and
various Native American and African groups have traditionally
practiced "persistence hunting," chasing antelopes or other game in
the midday heat, often for hours, until the animals overheat and
collapse. [I know an old man who hunts hares by slowly appraoching the
lair tangentially, in smaller & smaller circles. All he needs is a club.
No doubt all our ancestors once hunted in this traditional way... Not 2
days, but 10 minutes.]
During the past twenty years, Louis Liebenberg, an animal tracker
and the owner of CyberTracker Software in Cape Town, South Africa,
has observed the only persistence hunters still left, the !Xo
and /Gwi bushmen of the central Kalahari in Botswana. He reports a
success rate as high as 80 percent-and a meat yield that beats
hunting with bow and arrow, club, or spear. Only hunting with dogs
proved superior. [without arrow/club/spear/poison/bow... women, men & even
children can collect eggs, coconuts, crabs, shells etc. at the waterside]
Conditions have to be just right: the days must be long and hot, and
the terrain must slow down the quarry. Furthermore, the hunters must
be terrifically fit-the runs Liebenberg observed lasted as long as
six-and-a-half hours and covered as many as twenty-two miles. And
the hunters' tracking skills must be exquisite; finding and
following the quarry every time it bolts out of sight or mingles
with a herd is no easy task-teamwork helps. But done right,
Liebenberg says, persistence hunting is so effective that it may
have helped select for the excellent thermoregulatory system,["blunder" =
waste of water+sodium]
bipedal posture[no hunting animals is bipedal], and long strides[indris
have much longer strides...]
that we all possess. Perhaps
sadly, the practice is dying out, though the physical skill endures
in those who shun couches and run for fun. (Current Anthropology)
--Stéphan Reebs

[run for fun?? Very Happy]
Day Brown
Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 6:11 am
Guest
On Dec 20, 2:48 pm, "Marc Verhaegen" <fa204...@skynet.be> wrote:
Quote:
Somebody sent this to AAThttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/AATbut I think this
sort of "discussions" are more suited for s.a.p [some comments between
brackets --MV]

Quoted in Natural History Magazine, Decmber 2006-January 2007
(http://www.naturalhistorymag.com/). Click on Online Extras -
Samplings to view:
Running Man
Couch potatoes may disagree, but people are fairly well built to run
in the heat.["people"?? A adult young men of a few remote populations,
they mean?]We sweat more per unit of body surface area than any> other animal, [Yes, never seen in cursorial mammals: it's a waste of
water+sodium: as Montagna said, "a real physiological blunder"]and our upright posture exposes less body surface to> the sun than would walking on all fours, [yes, that's why all cursorial
animals walk on all twos... Very Happy The upright/shadow "argument" goes back
to Lee 1950 (Schmidt-Nielsen "Desert animals"), but it holds only if you
stand still & completely vertical at 12 o'clock... Nobody hunts "upright",
of course: it's the best way to alarm your prey...)and more surface to the> cooling wind. ["cooling" wind in "heat" where air temperatures at midday
far exceed 37°C??]On the hunt, those traits give people a distinct> advantage over most quarry. [yes, of course, that's the reason why human
populations densities are highest in the savannas...]In fact, Australian Aborigines and

various Native American and African groups have traditionally
practiced "persistence hunting," chasing antelopes or other game in
the midday heat, often for hours, until the animals overheat and
collapse. [I know an old man who hunts hares by slowly appraoching the
lair tangentially, in smaller & smaller circles. All he needs is a club.
No doubt all our ancestors once hunted in this traditional way... Not 2
days, but 10 minutes.]
During the past twenty years, Louis Liebenberg, an animal tracker
and the owner of CyberTracker Software in Cape Town, South Africa,
has observed the only persistence hunters still left, the !Xo
and /Gwi bushmen of the central Kalahari in Botswana. He reports a
success rate as high as 80 percent-and a meat yield that beats
hunting with bow and arrow, club, or spear. Only hunting with dogs
proved superior. [without arrow/club/spear/poison/bow... women, men & even
children can collect eggs, coconuts, crabs, shells etc. at the waterside]
Conditions have to be just right: the days must be long and hot, and
the terrain must slow down the quarry. Furthermore, the hunters must
be terrifically fit-the runs Liebenberg observed lasted as long as
six-and-a-half hours and covered as many as twenty-two miles. And
the hunters' tracking skills must be exquisite; finding and
following the quarry every time it bolts out of sight or mingles
with a herd is no easy task-teamwork helps. But done right,
Liebenberg says, persistence hunting is so effective that it may
have helped select for the excellent thermoregulatory system,["blunder" > > waste of water+sodium]
bipedal posture[no hunting animals is bipedal], and long strides[indris
have much longer strides...]that we all possess. Perhaps

sadly, the practice is dying out, though the physical skill endures
in those who shun couches and run for fun. (Current Anthropology)
--Stéphan Reebs[run for fun?? Very Happy]
I dont really have a dog in this fight, but think that more thot should

go into the varied ecology of the oldest hominid skull yet found in
Chad.
6 million years ago, with a skull very similar to "Lucy". I await news
of other homind bones to flesh out the physical structure, and outline
for us more of the adapations that have been under discussion in this
thread.
shipmodeler1
Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 6:11 am
Guest
A man in decent shape (which means a lot leaner and harder than anyone
you'll ever meet sitting in front of a TV) can outrun almost any
animal: Horses, antelope, deer, etc. Not in short bursts, but in a
long, steady, mile-eating trot. American Indians, for example, had a
standard hunting tactic of literally running deer into the ground and
simply knifing them. Heck, I'm only an average sort of runner, but I've
run with my dog on a hot day until she just lies down, panting
desperately.

The issue is heat. Humans sweat, but most animals pant. Sweating vents
heat terrifically well. The air may be hot as Hell, but if you're
moving, and the air is dry, it will suck away the heat (thus the
"cooling wind"). So the hotter the better when it comes to running down
game.

Did nature spend thousands of years shaping these traits on the
savannah, or did we evolve them for some other purpose that just
happened to work out for running, too? Why don't all animals sweat, if
sweating is better? Maybe because we're the new kids on the block, so
to speak, and they never felt much evolutionary pressure from just one
predator? I dunno, I just know humans do seem to be built for
long-distance running.
Lee Olsen
Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 6:11 am
Guest
shipmodeler1 wrote:
Quote:
A man in decent shape (which means a lot leaner and harder than anyone
you'll ever meet sitting in front of a TV) can outrun almost any
animal: Horses, antelope, deer, etc. Not in short bursts, but in a
long, steady, mile-eating trot. American Indians, for example, had a
standard hunting tactic of literally running deer into the ground and
simply knifing them. Heck, I'm only an average sort of runner, but I've
run with my dog on a hot day until she just lies down, panting
desperately.

A number of years ago my neighbor had a cattle roundup scheduled months
in advance. Volunteers simply couldn't change their prior commitments,
they had to do it that day. Unfortunately "that day" turned out to be
one of the hottest days of the year. Because the country is so rough,
dogs are very good at rounding up cows in the bush. Three of seven
dogs they had with them perished do to the heat, they just didn't know
how to pace themselves like the men pacing the horses. Generally that
time of year the temps are in the low 80s, so there had never been a
problem before or they would have been forced to leave the dogs home.
IIRC, the afternoon temp was 107. Those three dogs literally ran
themselves to death. Your dog probably stops to rest because the
adrenaline of a hunt is not a factor.


Quote:

The issue is heat. Humans sweat, but most animals pant. Sweating vents
heat terrifically well. The air may be hot as Hell, but if you're
moving, and the air is dry, it will suck away the heat (thus the
"cooling wind"). So the hotter the better when it comes to running down
game.

Did nature spend thousands of years shaping these traits on the
savannah, or did we evolve them for some other purpose that just
happened to work out for running, too? Why don't all animals sweat, if
sweating is better? Maybe because we're the new kids on the block, so
to speak, and they never felt much evolutionary pressure from just one
predator? I dunno, I just know humans do seem to be built for
long-distance running.

We evolved fingers very good for throwing split-fingered curve balls,
but it's hardly likely our ancestors were playing baseball out on the
savanna, so yes, your point must be considered. As far as why *some*
animals don't sweat if it is better, measure the square inches on the
back of a four-legged creature that is exposed to the mid-day sun. Then
measure the square inches exposed by a standing Homo. Homo is all skin
and bone (meaning the Turkana Boy), look at the mass some of these
animals that need to dissipate heat. So for their bulk, their system
probably is better, for us it's not.
Rich Travsky
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 6:11 am
Guest
Marc Verhaegen wrote:
Quote:

Somebody sent this to AAT http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT but I think this
sort of "discussions" are more suited for s.a.p [some comments between
brackets --MV]

Quoted in Natural History Magazine, Decmber 2006-January 2007
(http://www.naturalhistorymag.com/). Click on Online Extras -
Samplings to view:
Running Man
Couch potatoes may disagree, but people are fairly well built to run
in the heat.["people"?? A adult young men of a few remote populations,
they mean?]

Marthons. Millions run in them and shorter races.

Quote:
We sweat more per unit of body surface area than any
other animal, [Yes, never seen in cursorial mammals: it's a waste of
water+sodium: as Montagna said, "a real physiological blunder"]
and our upright posture exposes less body surface to
the sun than would walking on all fours, [yes, that's why all cursorial
animals walk on all twos... Very Happy The upright/shadow "argument" goes back
to Lee 1950 (Schmidt-Nielsen "Desert animals"), but it holds only if you
stand still & completely vertical at 12 o'clock... Nobody hunts "upright",
of course: it's the best way to alarm your prey...)
and more surface to the
cooling wind. ["cooling" wind in "heat" where air temperatures at midday
far exceed 37°C??]

When you run, you generate air flow.

Quote:
On the hunt, those traits give people a distinct
advantage over most quarry. [yes, of course, that's the reason why human
populations densities are highest in the savannas...]

No humans live in water.

Quote:
In fact, Australian Aborigines and
various Native American and African groups have traditionally
practiced "persistence hunting," chasing antelopes or other game in
the midday heat, often for hours, until the animals overheat and
collapse. [I know an old man who hunts hares by slowly appraoching the
lair tangentially, in smaller & smaller circles. All he needs is a club.
No doubt all our ancestors once hunted in this traditional way... Not 2
days, but 10 minutes.]

Both methods would've been practiced. How many people in a group/tribe
could one hare feed?

Quote:
During the past twenty years, Louis Liebenberg, an animal tracker
and the owner of CyberTracker Software in Cape Town, South Africa,
has observed the only persistence hunters still left, the !Xo
and /Gwi bushmen of the central Kalahari in Botswana. He reports a
success rate as high as 80 percent-and a meat yield that beats
hunting with bow and arrow, club, or spear. Only hunting with dogs
proved superior. [without arrow/club/spear/poison/bow... women, men & even
children can collect eggs, coconuts, crabs, shells etc. at the waterside]

There is more open land than water sides. Plus, eggs, crabs, coconuts, and shells
do not provide sinew, hides, bones, etc for other purposes.

Quote:
Conditions have to be just right: the days must be long and hot, and
the terrain must slow down the quarry. Furthermore, the hunters must
be terrifically fit-the runs Liebenberg observed lasted as long as
six-and-a-half hours and covered as many as twenty-two miles. And
the hunters' tracking skills must be exquisite; finding and
following the quarry every time it bolts out of sight or mingles
with a herd is no easy task-teamwork helps. But done right,
Liebenberg says, persistence hunting is so effective that it may
have helped select for the excellent thermoregulatory system,["blunder" =
waste of water+sodium]
bipedal posture[no hunting animals is bipedal], and long strides[indris

Predator birds are bipedal.

Quote:
have much longer strides...]
that we all possess. Perhaps
sadly, the practice is dying out, though the physical skill endures
in those who shun couches and run for fun. (Current Anthropology)
--Stéphan Reebs

[run for fun?? Very Happy]

Yes. Millions of people do. Heard of races? The Olympics is a good example.
Rich Travsky
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 6:11 am
Guest
Lee Olsen wrote:
Quote:

shipmodeler1 wrote:
A man in decent shape (which means a lot leaner and harder than anyone
you'll ever meet sitting in front of a TV) can outrun almost any
animal: Horses, antelope, deer, etc. Not in short bursts, but in a
long, steady, mile-eating trot. American Indians, for example, had a
standard hunting tactic of literally running deer into the ground and
simply knifing them. Heck, I'm only an average sort of runner, but I've
run with my dog on a hot day until she just lies down, panting
desperately.

A number of years ago my neighbor had a cattle roundup scheduled months
in advance. Volunteers simply couldn't change their prior commitments,
they had to do it that day. Unfortunately "that day" turned out to be
one of the hottest days of the year. Because the country is so rough,
dogs are very good at rounding up cows in the bush. Three of seven
dogs they had with them perished do to the heat, they just didn't know
how to pace themselves like the men pacing the horses. Generally that
time of year the temps are in the low 80s, so there had never been a
problem before or they would have been forced to leave the dogs home.
IIRC, the afternoon temp was 107. Those three dogs literally ran
themselves to death. Your dog probably stops to rest because the
adrenaline of a hunt is not a factor.

(many) Dogs love to run. A hunt has an ending, but ranch work lasts much
longer.

> [...]
Marc Verhaegen
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 6:11 am
Guest
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:458B5CEC.A6CE478B@hotmMOVEail.com...

Quote:
Somebody sent this to AAT http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT but I think
this
sort of "discussions" are more suited for s.a.p [some comments between
brackets --MV]

Quoted in Natural History Magazine, Decmber 2006-January 2007
(http://www.naturalhistorymag.com/). Click on Online Extras -
Samplings to view:
Running Man
Couch potatoes may disagree, but people are fairly well built to run
in the heat.["people"?? A adult young men of a few remote populations,
they mean?]

Marthons. Millions run in them and shorter races.

The first one who ran the marathon dropped dead... :-D

Quote:
We sweat more per unit of body surface area than any
other animal, [Yes, never seen in cursorial mammals: it's a waste of
water+sodium: as Montagna said, "a real physiological blunder"]
and our upright posture exposes less body surface to
the sun than would walking on all fours, [yes, that's why all cursorial
animals walk on all twos... Very Happy The upright/shadow "argument" goes
back
to Lee 1950 (Schmidt-Nielsen "Desert animals"), but it holds only if
you
stand still & completely vertical at 12 o'clock... Nobody hunts
"upright",
of course: it's the best way to alarm your prey...)
and more surface to the
cooling wind. ["cooling" wind in "heat" where air temperatures at
midday
far exceed 37°C??]

When you run, you generate air flow.

:-D

Enough nonsense.
Marc Verhaegen
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 6:11 am
Guest
"Day Brown" <daybrown@hughes.net> wrote in message
news:1166656653.692337.206740@48g2000cwx.googlegroups.com...

Quote:
Somebody sent this to AAThttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/AATbut I think this
sort of "discussions" are more suited for s.a.p [some comments between
brackets --MV]
Quoted in Natural History Magazine, Decmber 2006-January 2007
(http://www.naturalhistorymag.com/). Click on Online Extras -
Samplings to view:
Running Man
Couch potatoes may disagree, but people are fairly well built to run
in the heat.["people"?? A adult young men of a few remote populations,
they mean?]We sweat more per unit of body surface area than any> other
animal, [Yes, never seen in cursorial mammals: it's a waste of
water+sodium: as Montagna said, "a real physiological blunder"]and our
upright posture exposes less body surface to> the sun than would walking
on all fours, [yes, that's why all cursorial
animals walk on all twos... Very Happy The upright/shadow "argument" goes
back
to Lee 1950 (Schmidt-Nielsen "Desert animals"), but it holds only if you
stand still & completely vertical at 12 o'clock... Nobody hunts
"upright",
of course: it's the best way to alarm your prey...)and more surface to
the> cooling wind. ["cooling" wind in "heat" where air temperatures at
midday
far exceed 37°C??]On the hunt, those traits give people a distinct
advantage over most quarry. [yes, of course, that's the reason why human
populations densities are highest in the savannas...]In fact, Australian
Aborigines and
various Native American and African groups have traditionally
practiced "persistence hunting," chasing antelopes or other game in
the midday heat, often for hours, until the animals overheat and
collapse. [I know an old man who hunts hares by slowly appraoching the
lair tangentially, in smaller & smaller circles. All he needs is a club.
No doubt all our ancestors once hunted in this traditional way... Not 2
days, but 10 minutes.]
During the past twenty years, Louis Liebenberg, an animal tracker
and the owner of CyberTracker Software in Cape Town, South Africa,
has observed the only persistence hunters still left, the !Xo
and /Gwi bushmen of the central Kalahari in Botswana. He reports a
success rate as high as 80 percent-and a meat yield that beats
hunting with bow and arrow, club, or spear. Only hunting with dogs
proved superior. [without arrow/club/spear/poison/bow... women, men &
even
children can collect eggs, coconuts, crabs, shells etc. at the
waterside]
Conditions have to be just right: the days must be long and hot, and
the terrain must slow down the quarry. Furthermore, the hunters must
be terrifically fit-the runs Liebenberg observed lasted as long as
six-and-a-half hours and covered as many as twenty-two miles. And
the hunters' tracking skills must be exquisite; finding and
following the quarry every time it bolts out of sight or mingles
with a herd is no easy task-teamwork helps. But done right,
Liebenberg says, persistence hunting is so effective that it may
have helped select for the excellent thermoregulatory system,["blunder"
=
waste of water+sodium]
bipedal posture[no hunting animals is bipedal], and long strides[indris
have much longer strides...]that we all possess. Perhaps
sadly, the practice is dying out, though the physical skill endures
in those who shun couches and run for fun. (Current Anthropology)
--Stéphan Reebs[run for fun?? Very Happy]

I dont really have a dog in this fight, but think that more thot should
go into the varied ecology of the oldest hominid skull yet found in

Chad.
6 million years ago, with a skull very similar to "Lucy". I await news
of other homind bones to flesh out the physical structure, and outline
for us more of the adapations that have been under discussion in this
thread.

Sahelanthropus is said by some to be an ancestor of gorillas, by others, of
chimps, by still others, of humans. In fact, it's not very relevant whether
it was an ancestors of humans or of gorillas. What matters is that
obviously Sah.7-6 Ma was not far from the LCA of Pan, Homo & Gorilla. Yes,
it lived in a varied ecology = lake with grasses, trees etc., possibly not
unlike the Okavango today, see R.Wrangham 2005 "The Delta Hypothesis:
hominoid ecology & hominin origins" D.Lieberman, R.Smith & J.Kelley eds
"Interpreting the past: essays on human, primate & mammal evolution in honor
of David Pilbeam" Brill Ac.Publ.Boston: 231-242. It's
(short-legged)"bipedal" features (questioned by some) confirm my view that
these early hominids (= early relatives of P, H & G) were (at least
parttime) vertical waders-climbers in wetlands & deltas, with a locomotion
that could eventually directly evolve in that of chimps as well as of
humans, see our paper, with P-F.Puech & S.Munro 2002 "Aquarboreal
ancestors?" Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:212-217
http://reviews.bmn.com/journals/atoz/latest?pii=S0169534702024904&node=TOC%40%40TREE%40017%4005%40017_05
(can also be found in the AAT files http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT ).
The skull was not *very* much like Lucy's, eg, it had a remarkably flat
skull with a strong supra-orbital torus (erectus, gorillas...). But the
point here is that only blind fools try to find the most ridiculous
"arguments" (standing vertical at noon in hot open places, evolving a
cooling mechanim that wastes lots of water & sodium, developing large fat
tissues for running faster in savannas, becoming bipedal so that the prey
can see you from far, etc.etc.) to believe that human ancestors ever ran
after antelopes. No doubt these savanna fanatics even argue that women got
larger breasts than chimps to run faster over the savannas... Human
phyisology is extremely dependent on the presence of water. Of 6 or so
billions of people, only a few remote populations have (only male & adult)
members that at best parttime sometimes run after antelopes (= IMO a recent
development about as derived as that of Eskimos hunting for seals under the
ice). There are many times as many waterside populations that much more
easily find high-quality foods from the water (poly-unsaturead fatty acids,
iodide etc.): Oceanic islanders, coastal fishermen etc.etc. Incredible how
stupid these savanna believers are: they still argue like the geologists
before the theory of plate tectonics: they have to construct "land bridges"
(eg, "vertical running to minimise solar radiation") to "prove" their
nonsense.

--Marc Verhaegen
http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/outthere.htm
http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/Verhaegen.html
Rich Travsky
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:11 am
Guest
Marc Verhaegen wrote:
Quote:

"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:458B5CEC.A6CE478B@hotmMOVEail.com...

Somebody sent this to AAT http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT but I think
this
sort of "discussions" are more suited for s.a.p [some comments between
brackets --MV]

Quoted in Natural History Magazine, Decmber 2006-January 2007
(http://www.naturalhistorymag.com/). Click on Online Extras -
Samplings to view:
Running Man
Couch potatoes may disagree, but people are fairly well built to run
in the heat.["people"?? A adult young men of a few remote populations,
they mean?]

Marthons. Millions run in them and shorter races.

The first one who ran the marathon dropped dead... Very Happy

And the first one in the water probably drowned Very Happy

Quote:
We sweat more per unit of body surface area than any
other animal, [Yes, never seen in cursorial mammals: it's a waste of
water+sodium: as Montagna said, "a real physiological blunder"]
and our upright posture exposes less body surface to
the sun than would walking on all fours, [yes, that's why all cursorial
animals walk on all twos... Very Happy The upright/shadow "argument" goes
back
to Lee 1950 (Schmidt-Nielsen "Desert animals"), but it holds only if
you
stand still & completely vertical at 12 o'clock... Nobody hunts
"upright",
of course: it's the best way to alarm your prey...)
and more surface to the
cooling wind. ["cooling" wind in "heat" where air temperatures at
midday
far exceed 37°C??]

When you run, you generate air flow.

:-D

Enough nonsense.

Just because you don't exercise doesn't mean no one else doesn't...
Marc Verhaegen
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:53 pm
Guest
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:45BD774C.667AAB65@hotmMOVEail.com...
Quote:
Marc Verhaegen wrote:

"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:458B5CEC.A6CE478B@hotmMOVEail.com...

Somebody sent this to AAT http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT but I
think
this
sort of "discussions" are more suited for s.a.p [some comments between
brackets --MV]

Quoted in Natural History Magazine, Decmber 2006-January 2007
(http://www.naturalhistorymag.com/). Click on Online Extras -
Samplings to view:
Running Man
Couch potatoes may disagree, but people are fairly well built to run
in the heat.["people"?? A adult young men of a few remote
populations,
they mean?]

Marthons. Millions run in them and shorter races.

The first one who ran the marathon dropped dead... :-D

And the first one in the water probably drowned Very Happy

Yes, my boy, not unlikely: most aquatic mammals ultimately drown. Smile
But they don't drown with their first long swim...

Quote:
We sweat more per unit of body surface area than any
other animal, [Yes, never seen in cursorial mammals: it's a waste of
water+sodium: as Montagna said, "a real physiological blunder"]
and our upright posture exposes less body surface to
the sun than would walking on all fours, [yes, that's why all
cursorial
animals walk on all twos... Very Happy The upright/shadow "argument"
goes
back
to Lee 1950 (Schmidt-Nielsen "Desert animals"), but it holds only if
you
stand still & completely vertical at 12 o'clock... Nobody hunts
"upright",
of course: it's the best way to alarm your prey...)
and more surface to the
cooling wind. ["cooling" wind in "heat" where air temperatures at
midday
far exceed 37°C??]

When you run, you generate air flow.

:-D
Enough nonsense.

Just because you don't exercise doesn't mean no one else doesn't...

Apparently you are unaware that recent research suggests that endurance
training in athletes can causes cardial arrhythmias and sudden death.
J.Ector cs.2007 "Reduced right ventricular ejection fraction in endurance
athletes presenting with ventricular arrhythmias: a quantitative
angiographic assessment" Eur.Heart J.28:183-189.
Anthony Campbell
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 2:42 pm
Guest
On 2007-02-17, Marc Verhaegen <fa204466@skynet.be> wrote:
Quote:

training in athletes can causes cardial arrhythmias and sudden death.
J.Ector cs.2007 "Reduced right ventricular ejection fraction in endurance
athletes presenting with ventricular arrhythmias: a quantitative
angiographic assessment" Eur.Heart J.28:183-189.



This reference is wrong; it is to an article called:

"Evaluation of a radiation protection cabin for invasive
electrophysiological procedures"


Anthony

--
Anthony Campbell - ac@acampbell.org.uk
Microsoft-free zone - Using Linux Gnu-Debian
http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews,
on-line books and sceptical articles)
Marc Verhaegen
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 9:14 pm
Guest
"Marc Verhaegen" <fa204466@skynet.be> wrote in message
news:45d6ed4e$0$3131$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...

Quote:
... recent research suggests that endurance training in athletes can
causes cardial arrhythmias and sudden death. J.Ector cs.2007 "Reduced
right ventricular ejection fraction in endurance athletes presenting with
ventricular arrhythmias: a quantitative angiographic assessment" Eur.Heart
J.28:183-189.

Sorry, should be pages 345-353.
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=61674

--Marc
MClark
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 9:40 pm
Guest
"Anthony Campbell" <ac@acampbell.org.uk> wrote in message
news:slrnetg7sr.mic.ac@arcadia.acampbell.org.uk...
Quote:
On 2007-02-17, Marc Verhaegen <fa204466@skynet.be> wrote:

training in athletes can causes cardial arrhythmias and sudden death.
J.Ector cs.2007 "Reduced right ventricular ejection fraction in endurance
athletes presenting with ventricular arrhythmias: a quantitative
angiographic assessment" Eur.Heart J.28:183-189.

This reference is wrong; it is to an article called:

"Evaluation of a radiation protection cabin for invasive
electrophysiological procedures"

Marco mucks up a reference? I'm shocked! Shocked,
I tell you. I wonder what else he mucks up? No, the
the whole wet ape business bein' one mega misapprehension
is just too much to swallow....right?

Quote:
Anthony

--
Anthony Campbell - ac@acampbell.org.uk
Microsoft-free zone - Using Linux Gnu-Debian
http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews,
on-line books and sceptical articles)
--

"For whosoever quoteth scripture endlessly
hath neither job nor hobby." II Mumbleonians 4:19
Anthony Campbell
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:20 pm
Guest
On 2007-02-18, Marc Verhaegen <fa204466@skynet.be> wrote:
Quote:
"Anthony Campbell" <ac@acampbell.org.uk> wrote in message
news:slrnetg7sr.mic.ac@arcadia.acampbell.org.uk...

training in athletes can causes cardial arrhythmias and sudden death.
J.Ector cs.2007 "Reduced right ventricular ejection fraction in endurance
athletes presenting with ventricular arrhythmias: a quantitative
angiographic assessment" Eur.Heart J.28:183-189.

This reference is wrong; it is to an article called:
"Evaluation of a radiation protection cabin for invasive
electrophysiological procedures"

Sorry, Anthony, the paper can be found
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/our_journals/eurheartj/press_releases/freepdf/ehl468.pdf

--Marc


Thanks, got it now.


--
Anthony Campbell - ac@acampbell.org.uk
Microsoft-free zone - Using Linux Gnu-Debian
http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews,
on-line books and sceptical articles)
Rich Travsky
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:39 am
Guest
Marc Verhaegen wrote:
Quote:

"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:45BD774C.667AAB65@hotmMOVEail.com...
Marc Verhaegen wrote:

"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:458B5CEC.A6CE478B@hotmMOVEail.com...

Somebody sent this to AAT http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT but I
think
this
sort of "discussions" are more suited for s.a.p [some comments between
brackets --MV]

Quoted in Natural History Magazine, Decmber 2006-January 2007
(http://www.naturalhistorymag.com/). Click on Online Extras -
Samplings to view:
Running Man
Couch potatoes may disagree, but people are fairly well built to run
in the heat.["people"?? A adult young men of a few remote
populations,
they mean?]

Marthons. Millions run in them and shorter races.

The first one who ran the marathon dropped dead... :-D

And the first one in the water probably drowned :-D

Yes, my boy, not unlikely: most aquatic mammals ultimately drown. Smile
But they don't drown with their first long swim...

We sweat more per unit of body surface area than any
other animal, [Yes, never seen in cursorial mammals: it's a waste of
water+sodium: as Montagna said, "a real physiological blunder"]
and our upright posture exposes less body surface to
the sun than would walking on all fours, [yes, that's why all
cursorial
animals walk on all twos... Very Happy The upright/shadow "argument"
goes
back
to Lee 1950 (Schmidt-Nielsen "Desert animals"), but it holds only if
you
stand still & completely vertical at 12 o'clock... Nobody hunts
"upright",
of course: it's the best way to alarm your prey...)
and more surface to the
cooling wind. ["cooling" wind in "heat" where air temperatures at
midday
far exceed 37°C??]

When you run, you generate air flow.

:-D
Enough nonsense.

Just because you don't exercise doesn't mean no one else doesn't...

Apparently you are unaware that recent research suggests that endurance
training in athletes can causes cardial arrhythmias and sudden death.
J.Ector cs.2007 "Reduced right ventricular ejection fraction in endurance
athletes presenting with ventricular arrhythmias: a quantitative
angiographic assessment" Eur.Heart J.28:183-189.

Apparently you're unaware they had a sample size of only 47. There's considerably
more than 47 in these pictures


http://www.marathonsinternational.com/

http://www.marathonsinternational.com/images/mainimage.jpg

http://graphics.boston.com/bonzai-fba/AP_Photo/2005/04/18/1113847213_7503.jpg

http://www.limebooks.co.uk/f/marathon_l.jpg

http://daysof47.com:8080/plone/events-2006/images/marathon-10k.jpg
 
Page 1 of 2    Goto page 1, 2  Next   All times are GMT
The time now is Fri Jul 30, 2010 10:23 am